Federated learning enables collaborative model training without sharing raw data, but practical deployments increasingly require verifiable guarantees that clients compute updates correctly. Zero-knowledge proofs can provide such guarantees, yet existing approaches face scalability limits due to the combined cost of polynomial commitments and fast Fourier transform (FFT) intensive verification. Pairing-based schemes offer compact proofs but incur high prover and verifier overhead, while hash-based constructions reduce algebraic cost at the expense of rapidly growing proof sizes. This paper proposes Hybrid-Commit, a polynomial commitment architecture for Binius zero-knowledge proofs that aligns cryptographic primitives with the algebraic structure of federated learning workloads. The scheme separates verification into additive and multiplicative phases: linear aggregation is handled using batched additive commitments optimized for binary fields, while non-linear constraints are verified via hash-based commitments over sparsely selected FFT domains. Proofs from multiple clients are combined through recursive aggregation while preserving non-interactivity. Experiments demonstrate scalability in prover time and proof size (near-constant prover time across 4–11 clients; 160 bytes per client representing 341× and 813× reductions vs. FRI-PCS and Orion), although verification time (762 ms per client) does not scale favorably, making the scheme suitable for bandwidth-constrained scenarios. The scheme achieves under 2% end-to-end training overhead with no impact on model accuracy, indicating that workload-aware commitment design can improve specific scalability dimensions of zero-knowledge verification in federated learning systems.
Andriambelo et al. (Fri,) studied this question.