PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 2026British Journal of Haematology3 citationsOpen Access

A comprehensive analysis of pirtobrutinib in Chinese patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma ( CLL / SLL ): Results from the phase 3 study BRUIN CLL ‐321

View Full Paper
SYShuhua YiJCJiang CaoRFRu Feng

Key Points

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pirtobrutinib in Chinese patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma.
  • Randomized phase 3 study with patients receiving pirtobrutinib or investigator's choice of treatment.
  • Forty Chinese patients were enrolled, with 19 receiving pirtobrutinib and 21 receiving bendamustine/rituximab.
  • Endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, event-free survival, and safety assessments.
  • Pirtobrutinib significantly improved IRC-assessed progression-free survival compared to bendamustine/rituximab (median PFS not reached vs. 10.6 months).
  • Treatment with pirtobrutinib resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.281 for PFS, with a 95% confidence interval indicating strong efficacy.
  • Improvement in time to next treatment and event-free survival was observed, with hazard ratios of 0.150 and 0.322, respectively.
  • Pirtobrutinib demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with fewer instances of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (36.8% vs. 93.3%).

Abstract

Summary BRUIN CLL‐321 is the first prospective, randomized study conducted in covalent BTK inhibitor (cBTKi) pretreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) patients. In this heavily pretreated population, pirtobrutinib significantly improved progression‐free survival (PFS) compared to investigator's choice (IC) of idelalisib/rituximab (IdelaR) or bendamustine/rituximab (BendaR). This report presents results from Chinese patients enrolled in BRUIN CLL‐321, who were randomized 1:1 to pirtobrutinib (200 mg once daily) or IC of BendaR (idelalisib is not approved in China). End‐points included independent review committee (IRC)‐assessed PFS, investigator (INV)‐assessed PFS, overall survival (OS), event‐free survival (EFS), time to next treatment (TTNT) and safety. Among 40 Chinese patients (pirtobrutinib n = 19; BendaR n = 21), IRC‐assessed PFS favoured pirtobrutinib (stratified hazard ratio HR = 0.281; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.070–1.125, nominal p = 0.0554), with median PFS not reached versus 10.6 months with BendaR; INV‐assessed PFS supported these findings. TTNT (HR = 0.150; 95% CI, 0.031–0.728) and EFS (HR = 0.322; 95% CI, 0.094–1.101) were also improved. A trend towards OS benefit was observed (HR = 0.343; 95% CI, 0.031–3.787). Pirtobrutinib showed a favourable safety profile, with fewer grade ≥3 treatment‐emergent adverse events (36.8% vs. 93.3%) and serious adverse events (15.8% vs. 46.7%). These findings support pirtobrutinib as a clinically active and tolerable option for cBTKi‐pretreated Chinese CLL/SLL population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6975b32bfeba4585c2d6ea49https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.70334
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper