This analysis compares the classification accuracy of R-CNN and YOLOv8 features for tomato ripening, suggesting effective feature integration for quality estimation.
Accurate classification of tomato ripening stages and quality estimation is pivotal for optimizing post-harvest management and ensuring market value. This study presents a rigorous comparative analysis of morphological and colorimetric features extracted via two state-of-the-art deep learning-based instance segmentation frameworks—Mask R-CNN and YOLOv8n-seg—and their efficacy in machine learning-driven ripening stage classification and quality prediction. Using 216 fresh-market tomato fruits across four defined ripening stages, we extracted 27 image-derived features per model, alongside 12 laboratory-measured physio-morphological traits. Multivariate analyses revealed that R-CNN features capture nuanced colorimetric and structural variations, while YOLOv8 emphasizes morphological characteristics. Machine learning classifiers trained with stratified 10-fold cross-validation achieved up to 95.3% F1-score when combining both feature sets, with R-CNN and YOLOv8 alone attaining 96.9% and 90.8% accuracy, respectively. These findings highlight a trade-off between the superior precision of R-CNN and the real-time scalability of YOLOv8. Our results demonstrate the potential of integrating complementary segmentation-derived features with laboratory metrics to enable robust, non-destructive phenotyping. This work advances the application of vision-based machine learning in precision agriculture, facilitating automated, scalable, and accurate monitoring of fruit maturity and quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: