Experiment-based formulation enhances drug delivery in colorectal cancer, suggesting improved therapeutic outcomes.
Introduction: Oxaliplatin is a third-generation platinum-based chemotherapeutic agent widely used for colorectal cancer treatment. However, its therapeutic application is lim-ited by low solubility, systemic toxicity, and poor bioavailability. Methods: Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) were prepared using a micro-emulsion technique and further optimized via Box-Behnken Design (BBD), considering key formulation variables including Glyceryl Monostearate, Soya Lecithin, and Tween 80. Nanoparticles were charac-terized by in vitro drug release, drug loading, encapsulation efficiency, zeta potential, particle size, and polydispersity index (PDI). Cytotoxic efficacy against the HT-29 colorectal cancer cell line was evaluated using the Sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay. Results: The optimized SLN formulation exhibited a mean particle size of 115.41 nm, PDI of 0.202, and zeta potential of +23.1 mV, indicating stability and efficient cellular uptake. Drug loading and encapsulation efficiency were 10.2 ± 0.4% and 92 ± 3.2%, respectively. In vitro release studies showed sustained drug release, reaching 97% over 48 hours. Cytotoxicity as-says demonstrated enhanced efficacy of Oxaliplatin SLNs, with IC₅₀ values of 0.9751 μg/mL at 24 h and 1.168 μg/mL at 48 h, compared to free Oxaliplatin (52.95 μg/mL at 24 h and 16.33 μg/mL at 48 h). Discussion: GMS-based SLNs optimized with Tween 80, lecithin, and DDAB exhibited ideal size, charge, and high encapsulation. FTIR and DSC analyses confirmed component compat-ibility. The formulation showed sustained release and enhanced cytotoxicity, highlighting its potential to improve Oxaliplatin delivery and therapeutic efficacy in colorectal cancer. Conclusion: The optimized Oxaliplatin SLNs demonstrated improved solubility, controlled release, and enhanced cytotoxicity, confirming their promise as a nanocarrier system for col-orectal cancer therapy. Further in vivo studies are required to validate clinical effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khanra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: