Key result
Primary diagnostic codes identify AMI with ~92% positive predictive value against medical records.
Why the study?
The Korean NHIS database is widely used for cardiovascular research, but the primary diagnostic codes for major clinical outcomes required validation.
Primary diagnostic codes for major cardiovascular outcomes in the Korean NHIS database demonstrate high positive predictive values, supporting their use in population-based research.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports NHIS code use in AMI research; leaves open validation needs for other outcomes and populations.
Background and objectives The Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database has been widely used for cardiovascular research. We validated the primary diagnostic codes of major clinical outcomes, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), stroke, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) used for Korea NHIS claims. Subjects and methods From 2016 to 2017, 800 patients with primary diagnostic codes of AMI, GIB, stroke, or ICH at discharge were randomly selected from a single tertiary medical center in Korea (200 patients per each diagnosis). The positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and specificity of the primary diagnostic codes were calculated using hospital medical record review as the gold standard. Further improvement in the diagnostic validity of the codes was assessed by combining clinical information such as duration of hospitalization, blood transfusion, brain imaging studies, or prescription records of antithrombotic agents. Results Among 200 patients with AMI as the primary discharge diagnosis, 184 patients were clinically confirmed (PPV of 92.0%). For GIB, 184 (92.0%) patients with the primary discharge diagnosis were verified to have true GIB events, showing PPV of 92%. For stroke, 181 (90.5%) patients were clinically confirmed with true stroke events. For ICH, 143 (71.5%) patients were verified to be true ICH events. In stroke and ICH, the PPV and specificity improved after combining with the hospitalization duration, imaging studies, and prescription of antithrombotic agents. Conclusions For major clinical outcomes in the NHIS database, the primary diagnostic codes showed favorable reliability. For stroke and ICH, considerations of relevant clinical information could improve the accuracy of diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2019) studied Major clinical outcomes including AMI, GIB, stroke, and ICH (n=800). Primary diagnostic codes validation vs. Hospital medical record review as the gold standard was evaluated on Positive predictive value (PPV) of primary diagnostic codes for AMI, GIB, stroke, and ICH.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: