Epicurean theory challenges the naturalism vs constructivism debate through historical insights and performativity.
The Epicurean theory of social formation has been preserved in Hermarchus’s account, a major figure of the early period of the School. The “Hermarchus-Spinoza complex” refers to the Epicurean articulation of a politics that is inherently incompatible with the contrast between naturalism and constructivism. The Epicurean approach manages to overcome this binary because of its conception of phronesis as performative. The Hermarchus-Spinoza complex both provides a historical depth to the undoing of the naturalism vs constructivism binary and describes performativity in instrumental terms, which challenges ingrained assumptions arising from the critique of instrumental reason.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dimitris Vardoulakis (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: