PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 26, 2026International Journal of Reliability Quality and Safety Engineering1 citations

Self-Training-Based Wafer Map Defect Pattern Labeling for Classification Accuracy Improvement

View Full Paper
MKMasaru KurokawaTokyo Metropolitan UniversityYNYoshikazu NagamuraTokyo Metropolitan UniversityMAMasayuki AraiTokyo University of Agriculture

Key Points

  • The aim is to improve the classification accuracy of wafer map defect patterns using a self-training approach.
  • Developed a self-training labeling method to expand the training set
  • Trained an AI model with a limited set of labeled data
  • Predicted labels for unlabeled samples using the trained model
  • Modified prediction confidence scores to reduce misclassifications
  • Assigned labels to selected unlabeled data based on adjusted scores
  • Achieved a labeling accuracy of 96.7% in a simulated application
  • Demonstrated the effectiveness of self-training in enhancing labeling quality
  • Highlighted potential improvements in defect tracking and root-cause analysis

Abstract

Accurately classifying wafer map defect patterns is essential for tracking their occurrence and supporting root-cause analysis of systematic defects arising from manufacturing processes. While AIbased approaches have recently gained significant interest, they typically demand large volumes of labeled samples to achieve high learning accuracy. In this work, we introduce a self-training labeling approach that expands the training set by assigning labels to unlabeled data. Our method first trains an AI model using a limited amount of labeled data. The trained model then generates predictions for the unlabeled samples. We modify the prediction confidence for data that may be prone to misclassification and subsequently assign labels to a subset of the unlabeled samples based on this adjusted score. We present the results of a simulated application of the method on labeled data, demonstrating a labeling accuracy of 96.7%.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kurokawa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69770353722626c4468e85fahttps://doi.org/10.1142/s021853932650004x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper