Key result
High or low iLVEDV linked to increased incident HF risk in suspected CHD.
Why the study?
The association between CMR-derived indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume and risk of incident heart failure in patients with suspected coronary heart disease without overt heart failure, including the modifying effects of LVEF and sex, was unknown.
Does indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume (iLVEDV) on CMR predict incident heart failure in patients with suspected coronary heart disease without overt HF?
Cohort (n=5,471)
Does indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume (iLVEDV) on CMR predict incident heart failure in patients with suspected coronary heart disease without overt HF?
In patients without overt heart failure, CMR-derived iLVEDV exhibits a U-shaped association with incident HF, where smaller LV volumes predict higher risk in those with supranormal LVEF (>60%).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
U-shaped iLVEDV association warrants no practice change; leaves open whether CMR volumes refine HF prediction beyond LVEF in suspected CAD.
Aims We explored the association between indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume (iLVEDV) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and the risk of incident heart failure (HF) (stage C) in patients with suspected coronary heart disease without overt HF (stages A-B). We also examined the risk-modifying effect of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and sex. Methods We retrospectively included 5,471 patients who underwent vasodilator stress CMR for suspected coronary artery disease and without a history of HF. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression adapted for competing events models assessed the relationship between iLVEDV and new-onset HF (stage C), considering LVEF status as potential modifier. Results The mean age was 65.1±11.6 years, and 2,123 (38.8%) were women. The medians of CMR-iLVEDV and CMR-LVEF were 67 ml/m2 (55-80) and 66% (58-72), respectively. At a median (p25% to p75%) follow-up of 5.1 years (2.3-8.2), we registered 287 new-onset HF diagnosis. iLVEDV was associated with a U-shaped risk of incident HF. The risk was most pronounced with an iLVEDV>100 ml/m2 and <45 ml/m2. Notably, the association between iLVEDV and HF risk was influenced by LVEF status. In patients with LVEF<50%, a higher risk was found in those with larger iLVEDV. On the contrary, LVEF>60%, lower iLVEDV identified those at increased risk. Conclusions In subjects with higher LVEF, smaller left ventricle volumes identified a subset of patients with an increased risk of incident HF. These findings reveal a need for a better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of HF with supranormal ejection fraction.
Núñez et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in suspected coronary heart disease without overt HF (n=5,471). indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume (iLVEDV) was evaluated on incident heart failure (stage C). Indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume on CMR showed a U-shaped risk for incident heart failure (287 events over 5.1 years), with risk most pronounced at >100 ml/m2 and <45 ml/m2.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: