Qualitative research reveals non-disclosure as a strategy against marginalization in Black disabled faculty, suggesting further inquiry is needed.
Research rarely considers the roles of disability—and ableism—in shaping the experiences of Black faculty. Drawing from semi-structured interviews with 26 Black disabled faculty members, this study reveals how participants grapple with intersections of racism, ableism, and disablism (Dolmage, 2017) while deliberating disclosure. I leverage disability critical race theory (DisCrit; Annamma et al., 2013; Banks et al., 2022) and argue that non-disclosure is a strategic act of agency to resist marginalization at their institutions. However, the conditions that make non-disclosure a prudent decision limit the full participation of Black faculty in the academy. I conclude with recommendations for research and practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel J. Blake (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: