The evolution of the Welfare State has significantly expanded administrative functions, making constitutional mandates central to administrative actions and enforceable through judicial review. Within this framework, the doctrine of legitimate expectation plays a crucial role in ensuring fairness, accountability, and adherence to principles of natural justice. Although not an enforceable right, legitimate expectation serves as a vital ground for reviewing administrative discretion, preventing arbitrariness and abuse of power. Indian courts, through various judgments, have affirmed both procedural and substantive aspects of this doctrine, ensuring that administrative authorities act reasonably, consistently, and in conformity with Article 14 of the Constitution. By reinforcing transparency and protecting individuals from abrupt policy changes or unfair decisions, the doctrine strengthens the rule of law and upholds citizens' trust in public administration.
Adv. Antara Abhay Thorat (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: