Community efforts reduce common myna presence, affecting avian diversity and dynamics in urban areas.
Context. Calls for expanding community-driven efforts to reduce introduced populations of common mynas (Acridotheres tristis) continue. Although the detrimental effects of common mynas on avian community composition and richness are well established, eradication has proven possible for island populations, and information on the efficacy of population suppression efforts of mainland urban populations is sparse. Aims. We assess changes in avifauna associated with community-based control of urban common mynas. Methods. We conducted replicate transect counts of birds in Melbourne, Australia, within an area where common mynas were suppressed and an adjacent area where no suppression occurred, before and during the suppression. Key results. Population suppression reduced relative abundance of common mynas but did not alter overall species richness or diversity, including native and introduced taxa. However, on a species-specific level, suppression was associated with both increases and declines in large and small species, whether native or non-native. The largest positive response coincident with common myna suppression was an increase in the aggressive noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala) which, like common myna, detrimentally affects other native birds. Conclusions and Implications. Complex interaction webs likely occur in urban birds, and possible functional redundancy of common mynas may influence outcomes of suppression, creating a new set of “winners” and “losers”.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Linley et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: