Key result
Protocol outlines planned systematic review of creative arts therapies for post-stroke psychological outcomes.
Systematic Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This systematic review evaluates the effects of creative arts therapies on psychological outcomes in stroke survivors, suggesting potential benefits for mental health interventions.
Introduction Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability and mortality worldwide. Survivors can experience a range of physical and emotional challenges, often leading to depression, anxiety, and a poorer quality of life. Creative arts therapies (CATs), an umbrella term encompassing music, art, dance/movement, drama, and creative writing therapies, have increasingly been explored in stroke survivor populations as interventions to improve psychological outcomes. Qualitative analysis suggests these therapies can be helpful, but the exact efficacy of CATs in stroke rehabilitation, as well as the optimal intervention types and treatment protocols, has yet to be established. This systematic review and meta-analysis plans to evaluate the effect of CATs on depression, anxiety, and quality of life among adults recovering from stroke. Methods This protocol has been prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251237926). Eligible studies will include primary quantitative research involving creative arts interventions. Searches will be conducted in Medline, Embase, and PsycInfo from inception to December 2025. Two reviewers will independently screen records, extract data, and assess study quality and the certainty of the evidence using the RoB 2, ROBINS-I, and GRADE tools. Restricted maximum likelihood random-effects meta-analyses of Cohen’s d effect sizes and risk ratios will be performed to calculate pooled effect sizes for each outcome. Subgroup analyses will explore moderators such as the effect of study design, intervention type, session frequency, and patient setting. Dissemination of results Results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations, and clinical networks to inform evidence-based guidelines on the use of CATs in multidisciplinary stroke care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arora et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Stroke. Creative arts therapies was evaluated on Anxiety, depression, and quality of life. This article is a protocol for a planned systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effects of creative arts therapies on psychological outcomes in stroke survivors; no results are reported.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: