Abstract Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays have become increasingly popular due to their affordability, commercial availability, statistical power, and reproducibility. These arrays are being developed commercially for a wide range of species in various density formats. In this study, we evaluated the ability of commercially available medium-density (72,732 SNPs) and high-density SNP (702,183 SNPs) arrays for white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to accurately identify known genetically related individuals within a wild population. We also assessed the impact of SNP filtering thresholds on relatedness analyses and compared the performance of four common relatedness softwares: KING, COLONY, Sequoia, and COANCESTRY, on these known related pairs. Our analysis revealed that the medium-density array exhibited greater tolerance to filtering and lower sensitivity to bioinformatic pipelines, making it a favorable balance between cost, computational time, and statistical power for analyses such as population structure. Additionally, we found that reducing missing data, specifically by using a subset of 600 loci with no missing data, combined with the relatedness estimator Sequoia (which allows the inclusion of life history data), yielded the most computationally efficient and accurate results. These findings offer valuable insights into the optimal SNP array size, appropriate filtering thresholds, and the most effective genetic relatedness methods for wildlife population studies.
Christensen et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: