Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines feedback's role in enhancing entrepreneurial creativity among undergraduates, suggesting educational improvements.
This study examines how classroom climate and feedback quality/internalization shape the development of entrepreneurial creativity among undergraduates in China, and whether narrative re-authoring practice amplifies this process. We surveyed students enrolled in entrepreneurship courses across four innovation ecosystems-Shenzhen, Hangzhou, Wuhan, and Xi'an-and paired surveys with expert ratings of artifact novelty and usefulness across course milestones. After distributing 634 questionnaires, 496 valid responses were retained (in-person proctoring; tokenized QR to prevent duplicates). Established, Chinese-adapted scales showed strong measurement quality (loadings ≥0.70; α = 0.84-0.92; CR = 0.89-0.94; AVE = 0.61-0.71; SRMR = 0.058; HTMT <0.85). Using SmartPLS 4 with 5000 bootstrap resamples, we found that supportive classroom climate directly promoted entrepreneurial creativity development (β = 0.12, p = .009) and strongly enhanced feedback quality/internalization (β = 0.58, p < .001). Feedback quality/internalization, in turn, predicted creativity growth (β = 0.41, p < .001). The indirect effect of classroom climate on entrepreneurial creativity via feedback was significant and substantial (β_indirect = 0.24, p < .001; partial mediation), and narrative re-authoring practice positively moderated the feedback→creativity path (β = 0.09, p = .007). Framed by Self-Determination Theory and the Componential Theory of Creativity, the findings identify an actionable mechanism-ignite motivation with climate, steer progress with high-quality feedback, and stabilize iteration with narrative practice-offering theory-driven guidance for scaling China's innovation-oriented entrepreneurship education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caichan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: