An Embodied Framework for Stress Resilience: Somatic Reappraisal and Mindful Interoceptive Awareness as Core Mechanisms.

Abstract In an increasingly stress-laden world, understanding the mechanisms that support resilience is critical. Existing resilience-enhancing interventions have largely emphasized cognitive strategies. At the same time, accumulating evidence points to the foundational role of bodily experience in shaping emotional and behavioral responses to stress. This paper proposes a conceptual framework in which somatic reappraisal, grounded in mindful interoceptive awareness, is positioned as a central mechanism supporting stress resilience. The framework highlights how stress reactivity commonly unfolds through an Adaptive Automatic Cycle (AAC), characterized by habitual, non-conscious reactions driven by perceived threats and unmet needs. In contrast, the proposed Adaptive Responsive Cycle (ARC) introduces mindful engagement with somatic signals, allowing bodily sensations to be reinterpreted and integrated rather than resisted or misread. Through this process, somatic reappraisal is proposed to transform the individual’s relationship with bodily experience, enabling more flexible, goal-directed responses to stress. Resilience is conceptualized as emerging through the application of somatic reappraisal across three interconnected regulatory domains: (1) accurate perception of needs and threats, (2) balanced regulation of stress system activation, and (3) flexible behavioral regulation. By integrating somatic, emotional, and cognitive processes, the framework offers an embodied perspective on resilience that complements existing cognitive models. While empirical validation is needed, this conceptual model provides a foundation for future research and for the development of resilience-building applications across clinical, educational, and societal contexts. Preprint noticeThis manuscript is a preprint and has not undergone peer review. AI transparency statementLanguage-editing tools based on large language models were used to support clarity and readability. All conceptual development, theoretical integration, and interpretations are the author’s own.