PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Scientific Reports1 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating the predictive accuracy of supervised machine learning models to explore the mechanical strength of blast furnace slag incorporated concrete

View Full Paper
MSMd. Habibur Rahman SobuzSMSimanta MajumderMAMst. Suraiya Afrin

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop machine learning models for predicting the compressive strength of blast furnace slag concrete.
  • Developed advanced machine learning models for prediction
  • Assembled a dataset of 675 concrete samples with various components
  • Conducted hyperparameter tuning and cross-validation to optimize models
  • LightGBM showed highest predictive accuracy with R 2 of 0.946
  • XGBoost also performed well with an R 2 of 0.943
  • Identified optimal BFS replacement range of 30-40%

Abstract

Blast furnace slag (BFS) concrete offers significant environmental and durability advantages over ordinary portland cement (OPC) concrete, including reduced CO₂ emissions, enhanced long-term strength, and stronger resistance to chemical attacks. However, refining its mix design using conventional experimental methods is time-consuming and costly. This study addresses this challenge by developing advanced machine learning (ML) models to predict the compressive strength of BFS-incorporated concrete. A large dataset of 675 samples featuring cement, BFS, fly ash, aggregates, water, superplasticizer (SP), and curing age was assembled. Six ML models—AdaBoost, Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting Regressor, K-Nearest Neighbors, LightGBM, and XGBoost were evaluated. Comprehensive hyperparameter tuning via grid search and cross-validation optimized model performance and mitigated overfitting. Predictive accuracy was assessed using R 2 , RMSE, MAE, and MAPE metrics. Model interpretability was enhanced through SHAP analysis and partial dependence plots (PDP), revealing curing age, SP, and cement as dominant features influencing compressive strength. Results demonstrated that LightGBM (test R 2 = 0.946, RMSE = 4.41 MPa) and XGBoost (test R 2 = 0.943, RMSE = 4.52 MPa) exhibited almost comparable predictive performance; however, LightGBM achieved the highest overall accuracy, reflected in its slightly higher test R 2 and lower RMSE, which declares LightGBM the best model for predicting CS of BFS-concrete. PDP analysis revealed that the optimal BFS replacement was observed between 30 and 40% range. This ML framework eliminates resource-intensive experimentation, accelerating sustainable concrete design with industrial byproducts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sobuz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69800910aa6434d8c2036cb9https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36437-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper