Machine learning benchmarking demonstrates accurate compressive strength prediction in blast-furnace slag concrete, highlighting practical and interpretable mix design.
This study develops an interpretable machine learning framework to predict the compressive strength of concrete incorporating blast-furnace slag (BFS). To address the critical issue of data leakage prevalent in conventional random splitting, a rigorous grouped validation strategy, specifically the GroupKFold algorithm, was implemented based on unique mixture proportions. Seven machine learning algorithms, including linear baselines and tree-based ensembles, were comprehensively evaluated. Results indicate that the XGBoost model achieved the highest predictive accuracy and stability, yielding a mean Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 5.39 MPa and a minimal standard deviation of 0.54 MPa. A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach mathematically confirmed XGBoost as the optimal model. Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) combined with data-density rug plots were utilized to uncover the non-linear interactions between BFS and other components. Rather than asserting direct causality, the SHAP analysis provides robust model-based associations that align with macroscopic physical expectations while strictly preventing over-interpretation in sparse data regions. Finally, a conceptual graphical user interface (GUI) is proposed to bridge the gap between theoretical models and future batch-plant deployment. This research balances rigorous high-precision prediction with transparent interpretability for BFS concrete design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: