PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

DK3 - Clinical Readiness Tool: Predicting ACL Reconstruction Revision Risk using the Danish Registry

View Full Paper
JAJon AndersonMVMikko S. VenäläinenMLMartin Lind

Key Points

  • The aim is to improve prediction accuracy for ACL reconstruction revision risk using an enhanced ML-Cox regression model.
  • Analyzed data from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry for patients from 2005 to 2023.
  • Applied an enhanced ML approach using Cox regression with LASSO and SIVS for variable selection.
  • Randomized data split into 2:1 ratio for model training and testing.
  • Developed an online clinical tool (DK3) for predicting revision risk based on patient-specific KOOS data.
  • The optimal Cox regression model included age, Pain P1, and QoL Q2/Q3 as predictors.
  • Prediction accuracy was good with C-index values of 0.739 at 1 year, 0.735 at 2 years, and 0.727 at 5 years.
  • The DK3 tool predicted a 25-year-old patient's 1-year revision risk at 2.9%, which dropped to 0.8% when KOOS values were adjusted.

Abstract

Objectives: Previous machine learning (ML) analysis of national ligament registries found moderate accuracy for predicting ACL reconstruction revision risk. We examine whether an enhanced ML-Cox regression approach can improve the prediction accuracy for ACL reconstruction revision using data from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry (DKRR). Methods: Data was extracted from the DKRR on all patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction between 2005 and 2023. An enhanced ML approach using Cox regression with a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalised approach and stable iterative variable selection (SIVS) was applied using a multi-stage analysis. The most significant demographic, clinical and PROM data from this analysis of the DKRR were selected for the final Cox regression model. Data was randomly split in a 2:1 ratio into separate training and test cohorts for developing and internally validating regression models, respectively. Results: The best performing Cox regression model for predicting ACL reconstruction revision risk incorporated age (at time of primary ACL reconstruction), Pain P1 and QoL Q2 and Q3, from 12-month follow-up KOOS data. This model demonstrated good prediction accuracy 1 year (C-index=0.739 ± 0.027), 2 years (C-index=0.735 ± 0.020), and 5 years (C-index=0.727 ± 0.016) after 12-month follow-up assessment. We developed an online clinical tool (DK3 – Clinical Readiness Tool) for predicting risk and modified risk of ACL reconstruction revision at a patient-specific level. Using the DK3 to predict the risk of a 25 year-old patient with KOOS values of 2 for P1, Q2 & Q3 gives a predicted risk of ACL reconstruction revision of 2.9% (1 year), 5.2% (2 years) and 9.2% (5 years) after 12-month follow-up assessment. Using the risk modification option to adjust the KOOS values to 0 (i.e. normal) reduces the predicted risk to 0.8% (1 year), 1.5% (2 years) and 2.7% (5 years). Conclusion: An enhanced ML-Cox regression using patient age and 3 KOOS items obtained 12-months post-surgery provided good prediction accuracy of ACL reconstruction revision risk at 1, 2 and 5 years relative to 12-month follow-up assessment. The current modelling demonstrated greater prediction accuracy, requiring fewer input variables, compared to a previous ML study incorporating pre-operative data. The DK3 - Clinical Readiness Tool can be used to assess patient-specific ACL reconstruction revision and modified risk. This information can be used to guide patient rehabilitation and clinical management if required.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anderson et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fbbec1c9540dea80d8f6https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967125s00341
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Predicting Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Revision Risk2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2Current ACL Machine-Learning Models Are Nice Proofs of Concept but Are Far from Being the “Holy Grail” Prediction Tools That They Strive to Be2025
  3. 3Development of machine learning models for preoperative prediction of insufficient clinical improvement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction2026
  4. 4Unsupervised Machine Learning of the Combined Danish and Norwegian Knee Ligament Registers: Identification of 5 Distinct Patient Groups With Differing ACL Revision Rates2024 · 9 citations
  5. 5Preoperative prediction of residual rotational instability after ACL reconstruction using a machine learning model2026