PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026AI4 citationsOpen Access

Artificial Intelligence in Endometriosis Imaging: A Scoping Review

View Full Paper
RARawan AlSaadTFThomas J. FarrellAEAli M. Elhenidy

Key Points

  • The review aims to assess the application of AI in imaging for diagnosing endometriosis, focusing on machine learning and deep learning methods.
  • Conducted a scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
  • Searched five databases for studies from 2015 to 2025.
  • Included primary machine learning and deep learning studies related to endometriosis imaging.
  • Analyzed study prevalence by imaging modality and key AI tasks.
  • Identified 32 relevant studies out of 413 records.
  • Ultrasound was the most common imaging method (50%), followed by laparoscopic imaging (25%) and MRI (22%).
  • Classification tasks dominated the AI applications (78%), primarily through convolutional neural networks.
  • Most studies lacked robust validation and reporting quality, with frequent methodological gaps.

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological condition characterized by endometrium-like tissue outside the uterus. In clinical practice, diagnosis and anatomical mapping rely heavily on imaging, yet performance remains operator- and modality-dependent. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly applied to endometriosis imaging. We conducted a PRISMA-ScR-guided scoping review of primary machine learning and deep learning studies using endometriosis-related imaging. Five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar) were searched from 2015 to 2025. Of 413 records, 32 studies met inclusion and most were single-center, retrospective investigations in reproductive-age cohorts. Ultrasound predominated (50%), followed by laparoscopic imaging (25%) and MRI (22%); ovarian endometrioma and deep infiltrating endometriosis were the most commonly modeled phenotypes. Classification was the dominant AI task (78%), typically using convolutional neural networks (often ResNet-based), whereas segmentation (31%) and object detection (3%) were less explored. Nearly all studies relied on internal validation (97%), most frequently simple hold-out splits with heterogeneous, accuracy-focused performance reporting. The minimal AI-method quality appraisal identified frequent methodological gaps across key domains, including limited reporting of patient-level separation, leakage safeguards, calibration, and data and code availability. Overall, AI-enabled endometriosis imaging is rapidly evolving but remains early-stage; multi-center and prospective validation, standardized reporting, and clinically actionable detection–segmentation pipelines are needed before routine clinical integration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

AlSaad et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fcb6c1c9540dea80e765https://doi.org/10.3390/ai7020043
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper