Hydrogen-integrated decentralized energy systems (DIESs) promise communities higher renewable penetration, greater resilience, and sector coupling across electricity, heat, and mobility. AI supports forecasting, dispatch optimization, multi-asset coordination, and planning, yet designing AI-driven hydrogen communities is challenging because it spans physical infrastructure, cyber-control, and governance. This review (2020–2025) synthesizes design strategies for AI-enabled hydrogen DIESs, distilling architectural patterns, electricity–hydrogen co-optimization, uncertainty-aware operation, and digital-twin planning. It summarizes AI benefits (flexibility, efficiency, reduced curtailment) and recurring risks (forecast-optimization cascades, objective mismatch, data drift, safety and constraint breaches, digital-twin credibility gaps, cybersecurity and privacy issues, and weak reproducibility) and proposes a pragmatic roadmap prioritizing safety-aware control, standardized metrics, transparent assumptions, and community-appropriate governance.
Coteț et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: