Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review analyzes benefits and challenges of flipped classroom in health education, suggesting improvements for effective practice.
This study aimed to analyze the benefits, chal-lenges, trends, and recommendations reported in recent scientific literature on the implementation of the flipped classroom in health higher educa-tion. To this end, a systematic review was con-ducted using an interpretive qualitative approach, with the PRISMA method as the methodological guide. The final corpus comprised 27 empirical studies published between 2021 and 2025, select-ed according to thematic relevance, full-text avail-ability, and methodological focus. The findings identified three major benefits of the model: (i) strengthening autonomous learning by fostering self-regulation and independent knowledge man-agement; (ii) improving academic performance, with statistically significant differences across several assessments compared with the traditional model; and (iii) developing clinical skills, particu-larly through simulation contexts, case resolution, and autonomous practice. However, structural challenges were also identified, including insuffi-cient faculty training, technological limitations, assessment constraints, and institutional resistance. In conclusion, the flipped classroom is an effective pedagogical strategy for developing key health competencies, but successful implementation re-quires progressive curricular redesign, comprehen-sive faculty development, and flexible adaptation to each institution’s disciplinary and technological context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Urgilés-Arcentales et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: