Key result
Ticagrelor-ASA cuts stroke risk ~30% vs clopidogrel-ASA only in patients with Lp(a) below /dL.
Why the study?
Lp(a) is an independent risk factor for ASCVD with plausible pro-aggregatory platelet effects, but its impact on the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin treatment required evaluation.
Does ticagrelor plus acetylsalicylic acid reduce stroke within 1 year compared to clopidogrel plus acetylsalicylic acid in patients with minor stroke or TIA carrying the CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele, and is this effect modified by baseline Lp(a) levels?
Does ticagrelor plus acetylsalicylic acid reduce stroke within 1 year compared to clopidogrel plus acetylsalicylic acid in patients with minor stroke or TIA carrying the CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele, and is this effect modified by baseline Lp(a) levels?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers with minor stroke or TIA, ticagrelor-aspirin reduces 1-year stroke risk compared to clopidogrel-aspirin only in patients with Lp(a) <30 mg/dL.
Background: Lipoprotein (a) is recognized as an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, with its interaction with several platelet receptors offering biological plausibility for a pro-aggregatory effect. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of Lp(a) on the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor–aspirin compared to clopidogrel–aspirin treatment. Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis obtained from Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel with Aspirin in High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events II (CHANCE-2) trial. The CHANCE-2 trial was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, conducted in China, randomized patients with minor stroke or TIA who carried the CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele to receive either ticagrelor– acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) or clopidogrel– ASA. Patients were classified with Lp(a) levels <30 mg/dL and ≥30 mg/dL. The primary efficacy outcome of the study was stroke within 1 year, and the safety outcome was severe or moderate bleeding. Results: A total of 5915 patients were enrolled in this study. The median Lp(a) was 20.35 (9.70– 43.98) mg/dL. The proportion of patients with an Lp(a) level ≥30 mg/dL was 36.33%. Ticagrelor–ASA was associated with a significantly lower rate of stroke within 1 year among patients with Lp(a)<30 mg/dL (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 -0.87), but not among those with Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL (HR1.01, 95% CI 0.77-1.32), compared with clopidogrel aspirin(p =0.039 for interaction).Safety outcome of severe or moderate bleeding did not differ in Lp(a) groups. Conclusions: This post hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial suggests that Lp(a) may serve as a potential biomarker for identifying CYP2C19 loss-of-function carriers with minor stroke or TIA who benefit more from ticagrelor–aspirin therapy compared to clopidogrel–aspirin therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2026) studied this question. Ticagrelor–ASA reduced stroke risk by 30% compared to clopidogrel–ASA in patients with Lp(a) </dL, with no benefit in those with Lp(a) ≥/dL.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: