Key result
Lamotrigine is linked to a ~3% PR interval increase without excess pathological ECG prolongation.
Why the study?
The FDA warned that lamotrigine slows cardiac conduction and causes arrhythmias in heart disease, but within-person ECG changes on versus off lamotrigine had not been investigated.
Does lamotrigine increase the risk of pathological ECG abnormalities or cardiac conduction delays in people with and without heart disease?
Cohort (n=237)
Does lamotrigine increase the risk of pathological ECG abnormalities or cardiac conduction delays in people with and without heart disease?
Lamotrigine causes a mild, non-pathological increase in the PR interval but does not increase the risk of clinically significant ECG abnormalities, suggesting the FDA warning regarding arrhythmias in heart disease patients may be overstated.
Mild PR increase without pathological changes does not support avoiding lamotrigine in heart disease; challenges prior FDA warnings but leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Objective The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning that lamotrigine slows cardiac conduction, leading to arrhythmias in people with heart disease (HD). This is the first study to investigate the within‐person changes in electrocardiographic (ECG) metrics and prevalence of ECG abnormalities when on versus off lamotrigine, in people with and without a history of HD. Methods The cohort includes 237 people with ECG both on and off lamotrigine, stratified by a history of HD ( n = 97). The within‐person percent change in heart rate and ECG metrics (PR, QRS, and heart rate‐corrected QT [QT c ] intervals) on versus off lamotrigine is compared within and between groups. Linear mixed effect regression models with adjustments for covariates assess the association between within‐subject changes in ECG metrics and pathologies when on versus off lamotrigine. Results PR interval (atrioventricular conduction) is significantly longer on‐ versus off lamotrigine (mean = 3.1% increase). There is a significant increase in the PR within the no HD (3.5%), all HD (2.8%), and structural HD groups (4.1%) when on versus off lamotrigine, but there is no difference between groups. Regression models confirm that lamotrigine is associated with an increase in PR interval in the overall cohort, as well as those with and without HD. Lamotrigine is not associated with an increased prevalence of clinically pathological PR, QRS, or QT c prolongation, or abnormal ECG interpretations. Subanalysis in people with lamotrigine serum levels in the therapeutic range indicate that each 1‐μg/mL increase in concentration is associated with a 2.3% increase in PR interval. Significance Lamotrigine leads to an increase in PR interval in the general population and people with HD (population in FDA warning). However, lamotrigine is not associated with increased odds of PR prolongation or any ECG abnormalities. Despite in vitro data predicting cardiac ECG abnormalities, particularly in people with HD, lamotrigine is not associated with the development of pathological ECG findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryan et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in People with and without heart disease (n=237). Lamotrigine vs. Off lamotrigine (within-person) was evaluated on Within-person percent change in PR interval. Lamotrigine use was associated with a 3.1% mean increase in PR interval compared to being off the drug, but did not increase the prevalence of pathological PR, QRS, or QTc prolongation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: