Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide antiarrhythmic selection in practice; leaves open prospective validation and outcome studies.
We emerge with a modernized classification preserving the simplicity of the original Vaughan Williams framework while aiding our understanding and clinical management of cardiac arrhythmic events and facilitating future developments in this area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lei et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: