PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Bioresource Technology3 citationsOpen Access

Energy and environmental trade-offs in anaerobic digestion: Batch tests and LCA investigations of giant hogweed, canola straw, and manure

View Full Paper
ENEmmanuel NwanegboSMSamaneh MollashahiEFErik Ferchau

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the energy and environmental trade-offs of anaerobic digestion using different feedstocks.
  • Conducted mesophilic batch tests on giant hogweed, canola straw, and cow manure.
  • Performed a gate-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) to analyze emissions and energy recovery.
  • Evaluated seven scenarios, including mono-digestion and co-digestion configurations.
  • Mono-digestion of giant hogweed yielded the highest specific biogas yield and methane content.
  • LCA indicated manure and digestate storage as the main source of global warming potential contributions.
  • Scenarios with optimized feedstock ratios showed improved energy recovery and lower overall emissions.

Abstract

This study investigated the energy and environment trade-offs of anaerobic digestion (AD) using invasive giant hogweed, agricultural residue canola straw, and cow manure by combining mesophilic batch tests with a gate-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA). Seven scenarios, comprising both mono-digestion and co-digestions were evaluated. Mono-digestion of Giant Hogweed achieved the highest specific biogas yield (671 LN/kg VS) and methane content (74.7%), with no detectable hydrogen sulphide (H2S), while co-digestion introduced mix-dependent trade-offs between gas yield and emissions. The LCA identified the combined emissions from manure and digestate storage as the primary hotspot for Global Warming Potential (GWP), contributing 53-67% of total emissions. Crop-based mono-digestion scenarios exhibited higher GWP per tonne but lower emissions per kWh due to superior energy recovery; the same pattern held for abiotic depletion (fossil and elements). Sensitivity analysis showed that a 50% cut in storage emissions reduced GWP by 27-34% across all scenarios. Scenarios with higher net electricity output achieved lower impact intensities per kWh. The study concludes that optimizing feedstock ratios and implementing advanced storage practices is critical for maximizing both energy recovery and environmental performance of AD systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nwanegbo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fd81c1c9540dea80f2d0https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2026.134102
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper