Randomized trial evaluates energy production options in agricultural and municipal waste, highlighting environmental benefits.
The main sources of biodegradable waste come from agriculture and municipal waste, with animal manure and food waste (FW) being the most representative respectively. Most of this waste remains still unexploited, while there is skepticism regarding the environmental footprint of various methods of their utilization. This work provides a reliable comparative environmental evaluation using life cycle assessment (LCA). In the present work, LCA applied to compare two alternative scenarios regarding the management of (a) sheep and goat manure and (b) FW. Alternative scenarios for sheep and goat manure include composting for fertilizer and energy production via anaerobic digestion (AD), while FW scenarios include incineration and energy production through AD. In both case studies, the AD scenario generates environmental benefits (expressed as negative damage) across all three damage categories namely resource scarcity, human health and ecosystem quality. Regarding sheep and goat manure, the most significant effect of AD is on human health (−0.016 Pt) while in the scenarios of FW the superior performance of AD is particularly evident in the ecosystem quality (−0.21 Pt). Both case studies reached the same conclusion pointing out that the use of sustainable technologies for managing agricultural and municipal waste mitigates the environmental impacts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aravani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: