Framework demonstrates reduced carbon footprint in model selection for image classification, highlighting the benefits of tailored approaches.
The rapidly growing scale and environmental cost of artificial intelligence have become criticalconcerns. Training large language models generates as much CO₂ as the lifetime of fivevehicles. However, such powerful models are not needed for all tasks. This study presents anovel framework for carbon-efficient model selection based on dataset complexity. Sevendifferent architectures—three deep learning-based models (MobileNetV3, ResNet18,EfficientNetB0), three machine learning models (Logistic Regression, Random Forest,XGBoost), and one transformer-based model (ViT-Tiny)—are comprehensively evaluated onnine image classification datasets. The dataset complexities are measured by developing ascoring system that combines metrics such as inter-class similarity, texture complexity, edgedensity, intra-class variance, and spatial frequency. This score has been shown to exhibit astrong correlation (r = 0.89) with the optimal model selection. Experimental results show thatfor simple tasks, machine learning models emit 300 times less carbon than other models, withonly a 5.4% loss in accuracy. A gradient boosting regression-based recommendation systemachieved R²=1.0 in model-task matches. The findings show that for tasks with a complexitythreshold of τ<0.4, machine learning models achieve 99.5% carbon savings with an averageaccuracy of 94%. Furthermore, for complex tasks with τ>0.7, results demonstrate the need fordeep learning and transformer-based models. The results demonstrate that intelligent modelselection can reduce the carbon footprint of AI by up to 99%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tunahan TİMUÇİN (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: