PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Single-Stapled Double Purse-String Anastomotic (SIA) Technique in Robotic Malignant Sigmoid Resections—A Danish Single-Center Study

View Full Paper
HWHelene Juul WürtzUniversity of Southern DenmarkFDFlemming Hansen DallLillebaelt Hospital

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the efficiency and safety of the single-stapled double purse-string technique in robotic sigmoid resections.
  • Conducted a single-arm, single-center study over two years.
  • Consecutively registered patients with sigmoid colonic cancer planned for robotic resection with primary anastomosis.
  • Assessed operative time and complications related to the SIA technique.
  • The median time to perform SIA was 11.5 minutes.
  • 9.5% of patients experienced postoperative complications within 30 days.
  • Complications included ischemic bowels, pneumonia, and an anastomotic leakage grade C.

Abstract

Background: Stapled end-to-end anastomosis has a leakage rate close to 10%. Studies indicate that most leaks occur where stapler lines overlap. The single-stapled double purse-string suture technique (SIA) eliminates stapler line overlaps in low anterior resection (LAR) and may thereby decrease leakage rates. Methods: This single-arm, single-center study prospectively and consecutively registered all patients with sigmoid colonic cancer planned for robotic sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis over a two-year period. The primary outcome was time to perform SIA and secondary outcomes were total operative time and short-term complications. Results: The study group consisted of twenty-one patients. The median time to perform SIA was 11.5 min. Two patients (9.5%) experienced 30-day postoperative complications. One patient had ischemic bowels and pneumonia postoperatively and another had an anastomotic leakage grade C. Conclusions: This study has several limitations, including a small sample size, lack of comparator group, and short follow-up period. However, these preliminary results may indicate the SIA technique to be feasible without prolonging the operation substantially. Larger series are, however, evidently needed to evaluate the SIA technique in further detail to elucidate whether the technique is generalizable and safe.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Würtz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fde8c1c9540dea80f97ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031100
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Colorectal eversion technique combined with modified single‐stapled double‐purse‐ string low colorectal anastomosis2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Anastomotic leakage and chronic presacral sinus after transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: A comparative study to laparoscopic TME2021 · 7 citations
  3. 3Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer with difficult anatomical conditions2022 · 12 citations
  4. 4A Stapling Instrument for End-to-end Inverting Anastomoses in the Gastrointestinal Tract1979 · 167 citations
  5. 5The Relationship Between the Number of Intersections of Staple Lines and Anastomotic Leakage After the Use of a Double Stapling Technique in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery2017 · 56 citations