Bibliometric survey analyzes Iranian researchers' contributions to otorhinolaryngology, suggesting significant growth and collaboration patterns.
Background: Iranian researchers' scientific output in otorhinolaryngology needs to be evaluated from a bibliometric perspective. Aim: This survey aimed at studying Iranian researchers' global contribution to the field during the recent decade (2011-2020). Methods: Data were extracted by conducting a formulated search strategy in Scopus and analyzed by applying some bibliometric approaches and depicting scientific visualizing maps in VOSviewer software package. Results: Iranian researchers published 2488 documents on otorhinolaryngology during 2011-2020. The mean h-index of the documents was 42, with mean citations per document=6.60. The majority of documents were original research (87.78%) and in English (.96.70%). The annual growth of Iranian researchers' documents on otorhinolaryngology was increasing in the studied years (R2=0.91), especially in 2019 and 2020. Nader Saki from Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences with 65 documents (citations per document=18.42 and h-index=11) ranked first among top authors. Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology was the first-ranked journal with publishing 327 documents. Among research institutes, Tehran University of Medical Sciences ranked first with 631 documents. The first-ranked collaborating country was the USA collaborating with Iran in authoring 125 documents. Broad-ranged keywords covering almost all aspects of the field were used in the published documents that were included in four topic clusters. Conclusions: The global research on otorhinolaryngology made by Iranians has found its way. This study recognized important authors, journals, institutions, and countries as well as highly frequent co-occurred keywords and main subject clusters included in otorhinolaryngology documents published by Iranian researchers in the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peyvandi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: