Key result
Conicity index reveals elevated cardiovascular risk in ~40% of Brazilians, with higher rates in women.
Why the study?
Anthropometric indices such as the Conicity Index are emerging to assess central adiposity-related cardiovascular risk, but population-level prevalence and its sociodemographic and lifestyle associations needed evaluation in Brazilian adults.
Cross-Sectional (n=42,693)
The Conicity Index is a practical, non-invasive anthropometric tool that identifies a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk (39.6%) in the Brazilian population, strongly correlating with social determinants of health.
Supports Conicity Index screening in Brazilian adults; extends sociodemographic disparity data but leaves causal links and interventions open for prospective study.
Background Anthropometric indices such as the Conicity Index (C-Index) are emerging as accessible tools to assess cardiovascular risk associated with central adiposity, a key determinant of cardiovascular disease burden in low and middle-income countries. Aim To estimate the prevalence of cardiovascular risk using the CI and examine its association with sociodemographic and lifestyle factors in a nationally representative sample of Brazilian adults. Methods In this cross-sectional study using data from the 2013 Brazilian National Health Survey ( n = 42,693; ages 30–74), cardiovascular risk was defined based on sex-specific CI cut-off points. Results The overall prevalence of elevated cardiovascular risk was 39.6%, with a significantly higher rate among women (64.6%) compared to men (35.4%). Increased age, lower education, lower income, poor self-rated health, and physical inactivity were independently associated with greater cardiovascular risk, with regional and sex-based differences observed. Conclusion The CI proved to be a practical, non-invasive measure strongly associated with key social determinants of health and behavioral risk factors. These findings support its integration into public health monitoring and preventive strategies to identify at-risk groups, particularly in resource-constrained settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Elevated cardiovascular risk (n=42,693). Conicity Index (C-Index) was evaluated on Prevalence of elevated cardiovascular risk (95% CI 38.7-40.5). The overall prevalence of elevated cardiovascular risk in the Brazilian population was 39.6%, with significantly higher rates among women compared to men.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: