Cross-sectional study assesses parent-child agreement on brain injury perceptions after pediatric concussion, highlighting low consistency.
Objective To determine the agreement of parent and child responses to the Brain Injury Perception Scale (BIPS), a modified version of the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised, following a pediatric concussion. Method This was a cross-sectional study of 88 parent–child dyads who completed the BIPS at their initial visit to a specialty concussion clinic within 30 days following pediatric (11–18 years of age) concussion. Descriptive statistics were calculated, followed by Spearman’s rho (ρ), which assessed parent–child item consistency. Cross-tab tables were used to understand the direction of item consistency. Results Only five (13.2%) out of 38 BIPS items demonstrated parent–child consistency (p < .05), with both disagreeing that the brain injury is permanent (ρ = .27), will have major consequences on their life (ρ = .25), makes them upset (ρ = .22), will strongly affect the way others see them (ρ = .29), and will be with them for the rest of their life (ρ = .22). Conclusions Parent–child agreement regarding brain injury perceptions following a pediatric concussion was low (13%), reflecting the importance of assessing and then addressing parent and child perceptions individually in pediatric concussion management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmitt et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: