Key result
Dynamic T2-prepared MRI detects thicker vessel walls in PAD patients versus healthy volunteers.
Why the study?
Ultrasound is investigator-dependent and cannot track femoral artery wall thickness to the foot, prompting the evaluation of dynamic T2-prepared MRI vessel wall imaging as a predictive marker for peripheral arterial disease.
Does MRI of the femoral artery with a dynamic T2 preparation pulse accurately assess vessel wall thickness compared to carotid ultrasound in patients with PAD and healthy volunteers?
Cross-Sectional (n=12)
No
Does MRI of the femoral artery with a dynamic T2 preparation pulse accurately assess vessel wall thickness compared to carotid ultrasound in patients with PAD and healthy volunteers?
Effect estimate: Pearson r = -0.99
p-value: p=< 0.014
MRI of the femoral artery using a dynamic T2 preparation pulse provides a non-invasive, contrast-free method to assess vessel wall thickness that correlates closely with carotid ultrasound.
Supports MRI feasibility for femoral wall assessment in PAD; leaves open clinical utility versus carotid ultrasound.
Aim:The aim of this study was to investigate whether vessel wall imaging using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a T2 preparation pulse with dynamic implementation could accurately predict a proxy for atherosclerosis, carotid artery intima media thickness as measured by ultrasound. Ultrasound is still investigator dependent and a follow up of the femoral artery on its way to the foot and especially of the wall thickness is not possible due to anatomical reasons. Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) is a common disease in developed countries and it would be very helpful to have a predictive marker such as vessel wall thickness.Methods:Five healthy volunteers and seven patients with known PAD underwent MRI of the femoral artery on a 1.5-T scanner with a SENSE-XL-Torso coil (Philips GmbH Market DACH, Hamburg, Germany) using TRANCE and a dynamic T2 preparation pulse afterwards. These measurements were compared with intima media thickness of the carotid artery as assessed by ultrasound.Results:As measured by MRI, patients with PAD had significantly thicker vessel walls than healthy volunteers (p < 0.01). Carotid artery thickness matched femoral artery in patients with known PAD (Pearson r = -0,99, p < 0,014). Interobserver reproducibility was good (bias = -0.0088, 95% limits of agreement = -0.1089 to 0.09123), and ultrasound imaging results correlated closely to those from MRI (Pearson r = -0.99, p < 0.027).Conclusion:Conducting MRI with a dynamic implementation of a T2 preparation pulse seems to be an adequate, non-invasive method to assess vessel wall thickness as a prognostic factor for atherosclerosis without using contrast agent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elkenhans et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Peripheral Arterial Disease (n=12). MRI with dynamic T2 preparation pulse vs. Ultrasound was evaluated on Correlation between MRI assessment of the femoral artery and ultrasound assessment of the carotid artery (Pearson r = -0.99, p=< 0.014). Vessel wall imaging of the femoral artery using MRI with a dynamic T2 preparation pulse closely correlated with carotid artery intima-media thickness measured by ultrasound in patients with peripheral arterial disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: