PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026New Phytologist3 citations

Evolutionary constraints and climate variability jointly shape starch–sugar balance in woody plants

View Full Paper
WLWeibin LiNMNate G. McDowell

Key Points

  • To investigate how evolutionary constraints and climate variability influence the balance of starch and soluble sugars in woody plants.
  • Compiled a dataset of starch to soluble sugar ratios for 308 woody species across 220 global sites.
  • Introduced a dimensionless index to integrate storage and demand while minimizing artifacts.
  • Analyzed organ-specific starch and sugar ratios in different woody plant species.
  • Starch to soluble sugar (St : Su) ratio associated with growth, identified as key in carbon allocation.
  • Foliage had lower St : Su than lignified organs; conifers differed from angiosperms in storage strategies.
  • Stems showed higher St : Su ratios in tropical rainforests compared to boreal or arid regions, influenced by species composition.

Abstract

Summary Nonstructural carbohydrates (NSC) buffer plants against carbon imbalances, yet their partitioning between storage and soluble pools remains elusive at global scales. We compiled a dataset of starch to soluble sugar ratio (St : Su) for 308 woody species across 220 sites world‐wide and introduce a dimensionless index that integrates storage and demand while minimizing methodological artifacts. St : Su was strongly associated with growth, identifying it as a key axis of carbon allocation. Foliage consistently exhibited lower St : Su than lignified organs, reflecting a division between transient and conservative pools. Conifers accumulated more starch in foliage but less in stems relative to angiosperms, while leaf habits and mycorrhizal associations further modulated organ‐specific strategies. Contrary to expectation, foliar and root St : Su varied little among biomes, but stems exhibited higher ratios in tropical rainforests than in boreal or arid regions, reflecting differences in species composition and adaptive storage under disturbance. Phylogeny constrained stem storage, whereas climatic variability, rather than mean conditions, dominated allocation in leaves and roots. These findings establish St : Su as a robust functional trait linking allocation strategies, growth, and resilience, which can be used to improve vegetation model prediction of forest productivity and mortality under climate variability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ff19c1c9540dea811d64https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70932
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper