Mixed-methods study develops and validates a scale measuring prosperity aspirations in rural communities, suggesting its importance for development.
Despite the increasing emphasis on residents’ prosperity aspirations in rural development initiatives, the lack of a psychometrically sound measure limits comparability and rigor, as existing studies primarily focus on structural and policy factors influencing community prosperity, with insufficient attention to residents’ psychological processes and subjective experiences. Drawing on community psychology, this study develops and validates a measure of rural residents’ aspirations for common prosperity, integrating personal fulfillment with collective advancement across material and spiritual domains. Employing a three-phase mixed-methods design, Study 1 used in-depth interviews and grounded theory procedures (N = 28) to develop a theoretical model comprising four dimensions: material–individual, material–collective, spiritual–individual, and spiritual–collective. Study 2 generated a 19-item, four-factor scale via exploratory factor analysis and exploratory graph analysis (N = 581). Study 3 confirmed the scale’s second-order factor structure and psychometric properties with confirmatory factor analysis (N = 659). The Common Prosperity Aspiration Scale (CPAS) demonstrated strong reliability and validity across its four dimensions and the overarching second-order factor. This pioneering study elucidates the psychological structure of common prosperity aspirations and provides a psychometrically reliable measure for rural contexts. It serves as a valuable tool to explore their influence on behaviors and promote sustainable community development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DUAN et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: