Microplastic (MP) pollution poses an emerging environmental concern, yet current methods for isolation and quantification are often time-consuming, costly, and poorly adapted to real-world variability. In this study, a workflow for the preparation, filtration, and quantification of MP standards, emphasizing environmental relevance and methodological efficiency, was developed and evaluated. To address the scarcity of irregularly shaped MP standards, low-cost, environmentally representative standards were lab-prepared by grinding and sieving plastic sheets. These MPs were successfully categorized according to sizes up to ~250 μm and dyed for enhanced visibility. The filtration efficiency for two systems, a long-circuit pump (LC-pump) and a short-circuit vacuum (SC-vacuum), was compared. The SC-vacuum method demonstrated a more than 11-fold increase in filtration speed and higher MP recovery rates for both polystyrene and polypropylene standards. Ethanol-based solvents significantly improved MP dispersion and recovery for irregular shapes of the MPs, including polystyrene and polypropylene. Finally, a user-guided machine learning tool (Ilastik) was implemented for automated MP quantification. Ilastik showed a strong correlation with manual counting (r = 0.824) and reduced variability, offering a reproducible and time-efficient alternative. By cutting down cost, time, and technical complexity relative to existing MP analysis techniques, this workflow provides a more accessible path toward consistent and scalable environmental MP assessments.
Mohamadin et al. (Sat,) studied this question.