PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 20261 citationsOpen Access

Deformation Response of Corrugated Steel Pipe Arch Bridges Under Differential Foundation Settlement

View Full Paper
KSKaixuan SunLJLei JiangYSYi Shi

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand how differential foundation settlement affects the deformation of corrugated steel pipe arch bridges.
  • Conducted a one-year field monitoring program to assess settlement patterns of a ten-span bridge.
  • Evaluated spatial distribution, cumulative settlement, and settlement growth rates.
  • Performed numerical analyses comparing deformation under various conditions including ideal and differential settlement.
  • Assessed the impact of vehicle loading on bridge deformation.
  • Analyzed the effectiveness of installing a concrete lining inside the pipe.
  • Side spans exhibit significantly larger settlement than middle spans due to differential foundation conditions.
  • Maximum annual cumulative settlement recorded at the side span reaches 21.66 mm, approximately 4.1 times that of the middle span.
  • Initial settlement growth rate reached 30 percent in the first 1-3 months, stabilizing to about 10 percent afterward.
  • Differential settlement increases pipe stress by a factor of 3.4 and deformation by a factor of 9.1 compared to ideal conditions.
  • A 100 mm concrete lining reduces deformation by 10-20 percent, though it has limited overall load-carrying impact.

Abstract

To investigate the deformation behavior of corrugated steel pipe arch bridges subjected to differential foundation settlement, this study examines a ten-span continuous corrugated steel pipe arch bridge as the engineering background. A one-year field monitoring program was conducted to record the settlement of each span, and the spatial distribution pattern, annual cumulative settlement, and settlement growth rate were evaluated. Numerical analyses were then performed to compare the deformation response of the bridge under ideal foundation conditions, differential foundation settlement, and vehicle loading. Based on the numerical results, the effectiveness of a concrete lining installed inside the corrugated steel pipe was further assessed. The results show that the settlement of the side spans is significantly larger than that of the middle spans due to the differential foundation settlement in the mining area. The maximum annual cumulative settlement at the side span (span 2) reaches 21.66 mm, which is approximately 4.1 times that of the middle span (span 6). During the monitoring period, the settlement growth rate was high in the early stage (1~3 months), reaching up to 30 percent, and gradually stabilized to about 10 percent per month in the later stage. Compared with the ideal foundation condition, differential settlement increases the pipe stress by a factor of 3.4 and amplifies the deformation by a factor of 9.1. Vehicle loading has a pronounced effect on the deformation of the pipe crown, increasing the settlement by approximately 9 percent, while its influence on the pipe invert is relatively small, with an increase of about 4 percent. Installing a 100 mm thick concrete lining inside the corrugated steel pipe has limited influence on the overall load-carrying behavior but reduces the deformation by 10~20 percent. This reinforcement method is suitable for applications in existing bridges.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ffb4c1c9540dea8126a1https://doi.org/10.3390/sym18020267
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper