Identifies leaf nitrogen concentration in young Cephalotaxus hainanensis using color features, suggesting improvements in nutrient management.
Cephalotaxus hainanensis, a valuable medicinal and endangered conifer, requires scientific conservation and precision management to ensure the sustainable utilization of its genetic and ecological resources. Nitrogen (N) is a key nutrient that regulates plant growth and metabolism; rapid and accurate nitrogen diagnosis is vital for optimizing fertilization, reducing nutrient losses, and promoting healthy plant development. This study employed a combined approach integrating stepwise regression, correlation analysis, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression to identify leaf color features strongly correlated with leaf nitrogen content (LNC). A support vector regression (SVR) model, suitable for small-sample datasets, was then employed to accurately estimate LNC across canopy layers. Nine color variables were found to be highly associated with LNC, among which the Green Minus Blue index (GMB) consistently appeared across all correlation methods, demonstrating strong robustness and generality. Color features effectively reflected LNC variations among nitrogen treatments—especially between N1 and N4—and across canopy layers, with the most pronounced contrasts observed between upper and lower leaves. The Spearman-based SVR model revealed that the middle canopy maintained the highest and most stable LNC. However, the lower leaves were most sensitive to nitrogen deficiency, while the upper leaves were more sensitive to nitrogen excess. Comprehensive analysis identified N2 as the optimal nitrogen treatment, representing a balanced nutrient state. Overall, this study confirms the reliability of color features for LNC estimation and highlights the importance of vertical canopy LNC distribution in nitrogen diagnostics, providing a theoretical and methodological foundation for color-based nitrogen diagnosis and precision nutrient management in evergreen conifers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: