This work presents Elastic Spacetime with Scale-Dependent Coupling (ESSC), Version 10, a structural comparison and mapping of major theoretical frameworks in modern physics. ESSC v10 does not introduce a new physical theory, modify existing laws, propose new entities, or pursue unification.Instead, it uses the ESSC framework as a pre-theoretical structural reference to clarify where different theories remain descriptively admissible, and why apparent conflicts arise when those conditions are exceeded. Building on earlier ESSC versions that established multidimensional admissibility conditions, Version 10 shifts focus from framework construction to cross-theoretical illumination.Each theory is treated as occupying a specific region within a shared structural space characterized by observational scale, descriptive mode, boundary treatment, closure behavior, and translation admissibility. The frameworks examined include: * Effective Field Theory* General Relativity* Quantum Mechanics* String Theory* Emergent Gravity* The Holographic Principle Rather than evaluating these approaches by predictive success, empirical priority, or ontological claims, ESSC v10 analyzes their translation behavior across scales and regimes.Stable descriptions, restricted applicability, and structural breakdowns are interpreted as domain-dependent features, not as theoretical failures. A central contribution of ESSC v10 is the presentation of a **structural atlas** consisting of comparative matrices, detailed appendix-level analyses, and a schematic structural map.Together, these elements make explicit why no single theoretical framework can coherently cover all observational regimes, while also explaining why partial and domain-limited successes are both expected and robust. ESSC v10 is explicitly non-competitive and non-reductionist.It does not rank theories, argue for theoretical superiority, or treat unification as an implicit goal.Instead, it provides a neutral context in which multiple frameworks can coexist without hierarchy, synthesis, or forced reconciliation. The work is intended as a conceptual reference for researchers interested in theory boundaries, interpretation limits, translation constraints, and the structural conditions under which diverse descriptions of physical phenomena remain mutually coherent.
umimoto (Mon,) studied this question.