Abstract Introduction Focused ultrasound (FUS) is making rapid advances in the field of neurological sciences. While proven effective for tremor, pain and dystonia, FUS hold promises in experimental applications like blood-brain barrier opening (BBBO). BBBO is an emerging non-invasive option for intracranial brain tumor treatments by enhancing drug delivery and enabling liquid biopsies. Clinical trials underscore the need for consistent use of FUS for BBBO, which requires sophisticated facilities and standardized protocols to ensure efficacy and reproducibility. This manuscript outlines a single-center experience using MR-guided FUS (MRgFUS) for BBBO in patients with glioblastoma, incorporating technical insights and describing the evolution of a workflow mirroring an ongoing learning curve. Methods We developed an optimized protocol that includes comprehensive pre-procedural evaluations, a patient preparation process designed to minimize discomfort, and a sedation protocol utilizing dexmedetomidine, presented as a technical note involving four patients. The procedures were conducted using the Exablate Neuro 4000 Type 2 system, with MRI providing precise targeting and monitoring. Results Our optimized protocol significantly enhanced patient comfort and reduced procedure times. Employing a large treatment envelope and a 64-spot grid allowed for near-total brain coverage, minimizing the effort for pre-planning and reducing sonication time. Optimized MRI protocol contributed to the reduction in duration and confirmed successful BBBO, indicated by specific imaging signs and the resolution of these effects without any clinical complications. Conclusion The protocol we developed for MRgFUS-BBBO offers substantial improvements in terms of procedure efficiency, imaging quality, and patient comfort. This approach could be adopted in other FUS treatment settings to optimize workflows, reduce procedure times, and improve patient outcomes.
Bene et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: