This analysis explores antisemitism and imperialism in The Golden Bowl, suggesting a complex relationship between politics and aesthetics.
I argue that The Golden Bowl confronts and entwines a scrutiny of empire and the Jewish question. The Golden Bowl stages a refutation of the era’s antisemitism by transposing the Jewish question from France to the imperial Anglophone world, and in doing so the novel addresses the European past, the Anglo-American future, and the attendant political formations of nation-state and empire. Prior accounts of Jewishness in James’s work have given lesser attention to his late period aesthetic. I focus on The Golden Bowl because of its deployment of the high style of James’s late period, because of its occurrence at a moment of politicized antisemitism and imperial expansion, and, finally, because the aesthetic and the political become inseparable in this novel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benjamin Seigle (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: