Experimental study reveals phase behaviors in GeO2-CaO and GeO2-SiO2 systems, indicating reliable modeling for metallurgical applications.
The phase diagram of the GeO 2 –CaO system was investigated using differential thermal–thermogravimetric analysis and the equilibration–quenching technique, followed by electron probe microanalysis and X‐ray diffraction. The Ca 2 Ge 7 O 16 compound was confirmed to be stable, and a eutectic reaction of L → GeO 2 (hex) + Ca 2 Ge 7 O 16 was identified in the GeO 2 ‐rich region. Based on the previous and present experimental data for the GeO 2 –CaO system and reliable literature data for the GeO 2 –SiO 2 system, thermodynamic optimization of both binaries was carried out. The GeO 2 –SiO 2 system was reoptimized to ensure internal consistency and improved agreement with experimental data relative to the previous assessment, based on refinements to the heat capacity of GeO 2 and the quartz solid‐solution model. The liquid phase was modeled using the Modified Quasichemical Model, and the quartz solid solution in the GeO 2 –SiO 2 system, in which Si 4+ and Ge 4+ cations are mixed over a single sublattice, was described using the Compound Energy Formalism. A single set of self‐consistent Gibbs energy functions for all phases in the GeO 2 –CaO and GeO 2 –SiO 2 systems was obtained, reproducing phase equilibria and thermodynamic properties over wide composition and temperature ranges. The optimized database provides a reliable foundation for thermodynamic modeling of GeO 2 –CaO–SiO 2 ternary and multicomponent oxide systems relevant to metallurgical recycling as well as ceramic‐glass design and processing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rasouli‐Jouryabi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: