A systematic review evaluates GLP-1 receptor agonists in Parkinson’s disease, revealing no significant benefits but some safety concerns.
Background: Converging lines of preclinical evidence support the neuroprotective properties of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Nevertheless, results from randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) remain conflicting. Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of GLP-1 RAs in PD. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials. Data sources and methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE and Scopus databases was conducted on October 7, 2025, for randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials investigating GLP-1 RAs in adults with PD. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias (RoB2) tool. Results: Four RCTs comprising 667 PD patients (377 receiving GLP-1 RAs) were included. Between baseline and end-of-treatment, no differences were observed in the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III score change between GLP-1 RA- and placebo-treated patients in either off-medication (standardized mean difference (SMD): −0.16; 95% CI: −0.64 to 0.32; p = 0.52) or on-medication states (SMD: −0.13; 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.51 to 0.25; p = 0.49). No significant differences were uncovered in other MDS-UPDRS subscores, Non-Motor Symptoms Scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, or Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire scores. The risk of serious adverse events and odds of treatment discontinuation were similar between groups, but GLP-1 RAs were associated with an increased risk of weight loss compared to placebo (risk ratio: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.04–1.99; p = 0.03). Conclusion: GLP-1 RAs were not associated with improvements in motor or non-motor domains of PD. However, robust preclinical evidence and promising findings in select subpopulations warrant further RCTs to evaluate their neuroprotective potential, prioritizing long-acting and brain-penetrant agents that effectively engage central GLP-1 circuits for PD treatment. Registration: The pre-specified protocol of the present systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews PROSPERO (registration ID: CRD420251008703).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stefanou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: