Retrospective study compares oxycodone to sufentanil for pain management during thoracoscopic lung surgery, suggesting improved outcomes.
In video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, sufentanil patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) demands continuous infusion, raising opioid load and side-effects while lacking κ-receptor visceral coverage. Oxycodone’s dual µ/κ profile and longer action allow demand-only PCIA. We compared the 2 within a standardized TPVB-NSAID protocol. Single-center retrospective study (Jan 2017–Dec 2018). Adults undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery with multimodal analgesia were allocated to sufentanil (S) or oxycodone (O) PCIA. After 1:1 propensity matching (n = 527 per group), opioid consumption, numerical rating scale pain, analgesic demands, PONV, dizziness, sleep quality and length of stay were compared. Matched groups were comparable demographically and intraoperatively. Postoperative days 1 to 2 opioid use (morphine equivalents) was lower in O (0.8 mg and 1.2 mg) than S (27.4 mg and 36.5 mg; P < .001). Resting numerical rating scale on day 2 favored O ( P = .043); exercise scores were similar. Patients pressed the O pump more often (2 vs 0 and 3 vs 1; P <.01). PONV day-1: O 1.5 %, S 6.5 % ( P <.001); dizziness: 3.8 % vs 9.9 % ( P <.001). Good sleep reported in 73.1 % O vs 61.9 % S ( P <.001). Postoperative stay shorter in O ( P = .002). Within a TPVB-NSAID multimodal regimen, oxycodone-based PCIA provided equivalent analgesia, lower opioid consumption and fewer adverse effects than sufentanil-based PCIA, and was associated with earlier discharge after thoracoscopic lung surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: