Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article explores ethical dilemmas in treating anorexia nervosa, emphasizing implications for care practices in Ireland.
Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a complex psychiatric illness with severe and life-threatening medical sequelae, including death. Existing evidence-based treatments are linked to good prognosis and full recovery in many. For a small minority of critically ill patients, treatment decisions extend beyond voluntary engagement. Severe cases may involve involuntary hospitalisation, nasogastric feeding, physical restraint, and other coercive measures. While these interventions are sometimes necessary to prevent death, they raise profound ethical concerns. This article explores the ethical tensions in treatment of individuals with AN through the lens of the four principles of biomedical ethics, respect for autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice, examining the implications for clinical practice. It also outlines the legal mechanisms in Ireland governing involuntary treatment for AN. It considers treatment principles in children and adolescents as well as adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dunne et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: