This article explores decolonization debates in Odesa during the Russo-Ukrainian war, suggesting complex implications for heritage.
This article explores the debates over decolonization in Ukraine during the ongoing Russian war (2014–), with a particular focus on present-day Odesa, a port city on the Black Sea. It argues that the post-Soviet framework remains essential for understanding the practices and tensions on the ground, even as postcolonial perspectives gain traction and Ukrainian society seeks to leave the post-Soviet epoch behind. The study shows that decisions about which symbols, monuments, and cultural legacies to remove or reinterpret have sparked polarized interpretations: some Odesans see decolonization as an opportunity to reimagine the city beyond its Russian-centered representations of the past and the old Odesa myth, while others perceive these efforts as coercive, Soviet-style attempts to erase Odesa’s heritage. In the city, the debates over decolonization reflect a confrontation between two patriotic orientations: one opposing the Russian invasion, and another linking that struggle to a broader and deeper project of decolonial transformation. The article highlights how post-Soviet dynamics are manifest among both supporters and opponents of decolonization. Keywords: Russo-Ukrainian war, heritage, Soviet legacy, memory wars, culture wars, cultural front, Odesa myth
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vera Skvirskaja (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: