Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review demonstrates that improving the oral environment reduces complications in esophageal cancer patients, suggesting better outcomes.
Recent studies have increasingly indicated that postoperative complications after esophagectomy are correlated with poor long-term prognoses, making it crucial to prevent such complications. Based on our studies, we believe that central to this issue is the finding that among esophageal cancer patients who experience postoperative complications and have poor long-term prognoses there is a high incidence of poor oral environments. Here we review the results of our basic and clinical research studies, as well as evidence from other institutions, on the oral environment of esophageal cancer patients and its association with the incidence of complications and long-term prognoses. We hope these findings, which suggest “improving the oral environment of esophageal cancer patients can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and improve long-term prognoses”, will gain consensus and lead to safer esophageal cancer surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sato et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: