Mini review reveals analog rice as a sustainable alternative, promoting food security and environmental benefits.
Analog rice has emerged as a sustainable food alternative to conventional rice, addressing challenges in food security, environmental sustainability, and socio-economic development. Unlike paddy rice, which is resource-intensive and contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, analog rice can be formulated from crops such as cassava, sorghum, and sweet potato. These crops are more resilient to climate variability, grow on marginal lands, and require fewer inputs, making them suitable for sustainable food diversification. Environmentally, analog rice offers advantages in reducing water use, lowering ecological footprints, and mitigating methane emissions from flooded paddy fields. Socio-economically, it creates opportunities for rural development, supports micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), and encourages innovation in functional and fortified food products. However, challenges remain in consumer acceptance, higher production costs, and the absence of standardized regulations. Addressing these barriers is essential to ensure wider adoption and competitiveness. Overall, analog rice aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly zero hunger (SDG 2), responsible consumption and production (SDG 12), climate action (SDG 13), and inclusive economic growth (SDG 8). With innovation and policy support, it holds strong potential as an environmentally friendly food solution for future generations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bahlawan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: