Key result
DELIVER eligibility at discharge is not linked to higher 1-year mortality after adjusting for comorbidities.
Why the study?
It was unclear how often DELIVER trial eligibility changes after hospitalization for acute decompensated HFpEF and whether discharge eligibility impacts 1-year outcomes.
Does DELIVER trial eligibility status predict all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization in adults hospitalized for acute HFpEF?
Cohort (n=385)
No
Does DELIVER trial eligibility status predict all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization in adults hospitalized for acute HFpEF?
While most patients hospitalized for acute HFpEF meet DELIVER trial eligibility criteria at discharge and many ineligible patients become eligible within a year, eligibility status does not independently predict 1-year mortality or heart failure hospitalization after adjusting for baseline covariates.
DELIVER eligibility does not independently predict 1-year outcomes in acute HFpEF; leaves open whether trial criteria add prognostic value beyond comorbidities.
Background: Disease‑modifying therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains limited. The Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction (DELIVER) trial demonstrated the benefits of disease‑modifying therapy and outlined the eligibility criteria for this treatment. The present study investigated how often treatment eligibility changes after hospitalization for acute decompensation and whether eligibility at discharge influences 1‑year outcomes. Methods: This single-center observational cohort study included adults hospitalized for acute HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50%) between January 2020 and December 2022. Elevated N‑terminal pro‑B‑type natriuretic peptide and structural heart disease (left atrial enlargement or left ventricular hypertrophy) indicated predischarge DELIVER eligibility. Eligibility was reassessed in event‑free survivors at 1-year follow-up. Primary (all-cause mortality) and secondary (cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for heart failure [HHF]) outcomes were analyzed over a 1-year period. Kaplan–Meier and Cox analyses with stepwise adjustment were performed. Results: Of 385 patients (mean age: 83.7 ± 13.9 years; men, 53%), 79.2% were DELIVER‑eligible at discharge. Within 1 year, 41.7% of patients who were initially ineligible became eligible, and 85.4% of patients who were eligible remained eligible. The main factor contributing to these changes was progressive left atrial dilatation. Follow-up assessments revealed 35, 20, and 68 HHFs, cardiovascular deaths, and all-cause deaths, respectively. Although eligible patients exhibited high rates of crude 1-year mortality (hazard ratio: 2.43; 95% confidence interval: 1.11–5.30) and cardiovascular mortality and HHFs (hazard ratio: 2.83; 95% confidence interval: 1.13–7.09) than did ineligible patients, no differences in event-free survival rates were observed after adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidities. Conclusion: Although most patients with decompensated HFpEF met the DELIVER criteria, 41.7% of initially ineligible patients became eligible after 1 year. However, no differences were observed in the adjusted 1-year rate of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality and HHFs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ling et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=385). DELIVER eligibility at discharge vs. DELIVER ineligibility at discharge was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 2.43, 95% CI 1.11-5.30). DELIVER eligibility at discharge was associated with higher crude 1-year mortality (HR 2.43; 95% CI 1.11-5.30), but no differences were observed after adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: