This article examines Hegel's theories on violence and law in the context of a Hollywood Western, suggesting modern implications.
This article explores the conjunction of Hegel and the Hollywood Western through a close analysis of The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, adjudicating between competing readings of Hegel by considering their varied application to the interpretation of the film. In particular, I examine how Pippin’s reformist reading and Žižek’s revolutionary reading of Hegel produce different understandings of key themes of the Hollywood Western, including violence, law and the right of heroes. I argue that Pippin’s view of the central drama of The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance – the transition from the Old West to modern America, through a mythologised heroic act of lawless violence – is in fact much closer to Žižek’s Hegel than to his own. Specifically, Tom Doniphon emerges as a model of the Hegelian world-historical individual, whose passions bring about a revolutionary historical transformation, but who ultimately faces his own personal tragic end. I further consider the relevance of these ideas to a diagnosis of the contemporary world, especially the contemporary United States, where the intersection of violence, law and heroism remains as relevant as ever.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dylan Shaul (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: