Observational cohort study examines food insecurity's impact on maternal and infant health disparities related to race and income.
Objective: To examine how race, income, and food insecurity (FI) interact during pregnancy, and whether FI contributes to disparities in maternal and infant health outcomes. Design: Observational cohort study employed sequential explanatory mixed methods design, with a survey phase (including HFSSM 6-item) and medical record abstraction followed by semi-structured interviews. Setting: Online survey, virtual interviews. Participants: Individuals who gave birth in Louisiana, USA, between June 2020 - June 2021. The quantitative phase comprised 1,691 individuals who completed the survey. A nested cohort of 40 individuals (evenly split by race [Black vs. White] and income [low vs. high]) subsequently completed semi-structured interviews. Results: Race and income were independently associated with both FI and maternal and infant health outcomes. When considering both income and FI, low-income individuals with FI were 1.73 times more likely to deliver low birthweight (LBW) infants (aOR 95% CI; 1.07, 2.82) and 1.43 times more likely to experience adverse infant outcomes (aOR 95% CI; 1.02–2.00) than high-income individuals without FI. Black individuals with FI were 2.49 times more likely to deliver LBW infants (aOR 95% CI; 1.45–4.29) than White individuals without FI. Interview findings revealed low-income individuals faced disproportionate barriers to accessing healthy food and making dietary choices, which were further complicated by pregnancy-related conditions. Conclusions: The interplay between race, income, and FI significantly increases the risk of adverse infant health outcomes, demonstrating a synergistic effect. Targeted efforts to address FI, particularly among low-income pregnant individuals, are essential to improving maternal and infant health outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dickey et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: